Let’s Overhaul the NBA Executive of the Year Award

The Executive of the Year Award is a strange award. This award taks a job with a strong long term strategic focus and grades it against short term outcomes. Of course these are not mutually exclusive and good execs will be proficient at thinking and acting in the interests of both the long and short term, however Rome was not built in a day.

Here are some of our leading candidates for the 2018 award

  • Dell Demps traded for Nikola Mirotic the day after Demarcus Cousins went down, a move that breathed life into a desperate franchise finally tasting playoff success.
  • Daryl Morey took a huge risk and traded his entire war chest of assets for Chris Paul and took his franchises elite offense to historic levels.
  • Danny Ainge secured Gordon Hayward in free agency, traded away a potentially crippling, crippled Isaiah Thomas for the (then) healthy and willing Kyrie Irving, traded down in the draft and still got their man, Jayson Tatum, in addition to another first rounder.
  • Kevin Pritchard at Indiana, traded away a disgruntled Paul George for Victor Oladipo and Domantas Sabonis, in what was at the time considered highway robbery, but actually turned out to be one of the moves of the summer.
  • Bryan Colangelo trading for Ersan Illyasova and Marco Belinelli took the 76ers from an intriguing and exciting playoff hopeful to downright frightening finals contender.

Some of these moves will have a lasting impact on the league, and some may be forgotten in 6 months time.

But how should we think about these moves when we are considering our candidates for Executive of the Year. Well first what is the objective of any NBA executive? Let’s be romantic here and assume every Executive’s goal is to win an NBA Championship (we know that this isn’t entirely true, and while on court performance plays a huge role in a teams overall success, factors such as financial performance, team perception etc dictate the freedom with which executives can pursue their goal of attaining a title). So if every GM is trying to win a title which GM has done that best? The one who set his or her team up for sustained success or the one who made the moves to put their team over the top right now.

Well here is a radical idea for you. Why not consider both? Consider a GM’s history, the moves he or she has made to get their team to this point. Not all moves made today will have an impact immediately, they may instead shape the franchise and the league for years to come.

So now the question becomes, which exec, through sustained excellence, has put his team in the best position to win a title in the present year and in the future? For me this is how we should be grading our GMs. It aligns better with their actual jobs and gives credit to GMs like RC Buford who drafted Kawhi Leonard 15th overall and set his franchise up for success beyond the Tim Duncan era.

So who should win the Award this year? Well the answer is simple, Sam Hinkie.

Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images

No NBA exec has had more influence over the league this year and most likely for the next 10 years than Hinkie. He may no longer be an NBA exec and the League would rather sanction resting than reward the process, however the cause and effect of the process cannot be denied. While he was not afforded the decency to reap the fruits of his labors, there is no doubt in my mind that the 76ers would not be a 52 win, 3rd seed, led by a rookie and a second year player without the process. A team with potentially a decade of 50 win seasons and finals appearances ahead of them. Golden State and Philadelphia are the only two teams in the league I can say with absolute certainty that will feature in an NBA finals between now and 2030 (Boston are close and so too are the Rockets).

Yes Bryan Colangelo made some shrewd off-season and mid-season moves that have been invaluable to the success of the 2018 76ers season. But it was Hinkie who came up with a strategy that he believed would build a dynasty. Hinkie had the guts to do the unthinkable. It cannot be understated how radical and frankly outrageous the process was. The easy option would have been to re-tool, go back for another round with all-star Holiday and a bunch of serviceable role players. Potentially flirt with home court advantage in the first round. Maybe you get lucky in the draft with a pick in the late teens and snag a future All-Star or you land one in free agency. Instead Hinkie gamed the system and crafted what he thought was a surefire approach to acquiring talent. And in 2018 we have seen that it works.

simmons_embiid (1)
Getty Images

Without Hinkie there is no core of Embiid, Simmons, Saric and Covington. There is no promising but confusing rookie in Fultz. We can only speculate as to where the Sixers would be without the process, however we know where the process has got them now and we have a pretty clear picture of where the process will take them next.
Hinkie wanted to build a championship team and while there is still a long way to go, there is no doubt the 76ers are closer than any young team to getting there.

You can follow Jack on Twitter @johnbirtwhistle

And you can follow Posterized on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/posterizedaus/




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s